Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update

J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7 Suppl):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.003.

Abstract

This prospective, randomized, multicenter study of alumina ceramic-on-alumina ceramic bearing couples includes 452 patients (475 hips). Their average age was 53 years with approximately two thirds men and 82% with osteoarthritis. At an average 8-year follow-up, clinical results were excellent and cortical erosions significantly less than in the conventional polyethylene-on-metal bearing group. Nine hips have undergone revision of one or both components for any reason. Of the 380 ceramic liners, 2 (0.5%) have fractured requiring reoperation, and 3 (0.8%) ceramic patients reported a transient squeaking sound, one of which had a head and liner change due to groin pain secondary to psoas tendinitis at 5 years. With no revisions for aseptic loosening and minimal cortical erosions, alumina-ceramic bearing couples are performing in a manner superior to the polyethylene-on-metal bearing in this young, active patient population.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Oxide*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / instrumentation*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / trends
  • Ceramics*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Prosthesis / standards*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metals
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery
  • Polyethylenes
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation

Substances

  • Metals
  • Polyethylenes
  • Aluminum Oxide