Abstract
Proponents of navigated hip arthroplasty have suggested that it may increase the precision of acetabular component placement. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the validity of this theory. We searched, in duplicate, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised trials comparing the use of computer navigation with the freehand technique for acetabular cup placement within the desired alignment. We assessed the methodological quality of the studies and abstracted the relevant data. Tests of heterogeneity and publication bias were performed. From the three studies included, there was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies. A total of 250 patients were entered into the analysis. The beneficial odds ratio for the number of outliers was 0.285 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.143 to 0.569; p < 0.001). We conclude that navigation in hip arthroplasty improves the precision of acetabular cup placement by decreasing the number of outliers from the desired alignment.
Résumé
On peut penser que l’utilisation de la navigation au cours des prothèses de hanche va améliorer la précision du positionnement cotyloïdien. Nous avons conduit une étude systématique et une méta analyse de façon à valider cette théorieMéthode : les recherches ont été réalisé sur MEDLINE, EMBASE et COCHRANE, essais randomisés comparant l’utilisation de la navigation et l’utilisation des techniques classiques à main levée. Différents tests statistiques ont été réalisés.Résultat : à partir de 3 études inclues, il n’y a pas de différence entre ces 3 études. Un total de 250 patients ont été analysés, le ratio des hanches en dehors de la moyenne a été de 0,285 (95% CI: 0,143 et 0,569; p < 0,001). Nous pouvons affirmer que la navigation au cours de la prothèse totale de hanche permet une meilleure précision du positionnement de la cupule et diminue le nombre de cupules en mauvaise position.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Del Schutte H Jr, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, Livermore JT, Ilstrup D, Morrey BF (1998) Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:621–626
DiGioia AM 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, Moody JE Jr, Nikou C, Labarca RS, Levison TJ, Picard F (2002) Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17:359–364
DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18:123–128
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634
Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB (2007) Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22:151–159
Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–179
Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka A (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):163–167
Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ (1998) Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13:530–534
Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R (2002) Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7:99–106
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900
Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M (2006) THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:160–167
Parratte S, Argenson JN (2007) Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:494–499
Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS (1997) The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1202–1210
Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S (2007) Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):455–460
Weil Y, Mattan Y, Kandel L, Eisenberg O, Liebergall M (2006) Navigation-assisted minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthoplasty. Orthopedics 29(3):200–206
Wixson RL, MacDonald MA (2005) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty 20 (7 Suppl 3):51–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gandhi, R., Marchie, A., Farrokhyar, F. et al. Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 593–597 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0539-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0539-6