Table 3

Main problems identified through the pathway mapping and suggested improvements

Problems identified through pathway mappingSuggested improvements to the existing systemLean six Sigma principles applied
1. Multiple methods of reporting
2. Methods not inclusive of each other—pathways 1 and 3, 1 and 2, 1,2 and 3 occur simultaneously in different combination with no recommendation on the best pathway to follow for each event
1. Simplify the existing system by removing multiple pathwaysRemove non-value added steps
3. No guidance on the best pathway(s) to follow2. Improve staff trainingInvolve staff and Improve staff training
4. Not all events reported by clinicians via Datix are reported to MHRA via yellow card
5. Clinical information is interpreted and summarised by a non-clinician before reporting to MHRA
6. Variability and bias in the events reported to MHRA from manufacturers
3. Reporting data directly from the end user to MHRA/manufacturer
4. Increased transparency of reporting and process
5. Increase awareness of yellow card among clinical teams
Involve staff and Improve staff training
Manage by fact and reduce variation (use of accurate data)
7. Maintenance contracts often not available6. Organisation of maintenance contractsManage, improve and smooth the process flow
8. Devices not reparable internally, are thrown away if no maintenance contract is in place (with often no record)
9. Reporting directly to manufacturer is the most common pathway followed in operating theatres with no log of events reported and inability to carry out trend analysis
7. Create a log of all devices in use
8. Improve data sources
Manage by fact and reduce variation (use of accurate data)
10.Lack of data leads to decision making in the absence of evidence9. Improve data sources
10.Improve data access to clinical teams
11.Move away from incident reporting only and include near misses
Manage by fact and reduce variation (use of accurate data)
Identify and understand how the work gets done
11.Unreported events—the extent is unknown with no log of events
12.Unreported events—removes possibility for improvement from manufacturer
12.Improve data sources
13.Move away from assessment and surveillance into prevention
Manage by fact and reduce variation (use of accurate data)
Identify and understand how the work gets done
13.Feedback from MHRA stops with medical device safety officer and Trust safety committee and does not reach the end user.14.Increased transparency of reporting and process
15.Improve communication between MHRA, clinicians and manufacturers
Focus on patients and staff
Manage by fact and reduce variation
Undertake improvement activity in a systematic way
  • MHRA, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.